Outline

JEIM

Oxidative Interaction of Adult and Fetal Methemoglobin with Erythrocyte Membranes

Author(s): Nicholas J. White1, Natalya Timchenko2, Maxin Evstigneev2, Valen Rubakina2
1Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mae Ramat, Tak, 63140, Thailand.
2Department of Food and Processing Technologies, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Kharkiv, Ukraine.
White, Nicholas J.. et al “Oxidative Interaction of Adult and Fetal Methemoglobin with Erythrocyte Membranes.” Journal of Computational and Engineering Sciences Issue 4: 10-13, doi:.

Abstract

Earlier studies using artificial lipid membranes demonstrated that fetal methemoglobin
exhibits enhanced oxidative interaction with liposomes compared to adult methemoglobin.
The present study extends these observations to biologically relevant erythrocyte membrane
systems. Adult and fetal methemoglobin were prepared by oxidation of hemoglobin A and
F, respectively. Erythrocyte membranes and erythrocyte ghosts were isolated from adult
donor blood and umbilical cord blood. The interaction of methemoglobin derivatives with
erythrocyte membraneswas studied by spectrophotometric monitoring of the Soret band and by
biochemical assessment of lipid peroxidation. Fetal methemoglobin induced more pronounced
oxidative alterations in erythrocyte membranes than adult methemoglobin, particularly in
neonatal membrane preparations. The obtained results confirm that fetal methemoglobin
exhibits enhanced oxidative membrane activity not only in model membranes but also in
ex vivo erythrocyte systems, providing mechanistic insight into neonatal susceptibility to
oxidative hemoglobin stress.

Keywords
Methemoglobin, methemoglobin, erythrocyte membranes, oxidative stress.

Related Articles

Azra Nishat1, Shazadi Sultana2, Arshiya Sultana2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Nizamia Tibbi College Charminar, Hyderabad, India
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Institute of Unani Medicine, PG Institute of Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Rinaldo Bellomo1,2, John A. Kellum3, Claudio Ronco4
1Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
2School of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Australia
3Center for Critical Care Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
4International Renal Research Institute, Vicenza, Italy.
Ivica Letunic1, Lars Nielsen1, Peer Bork2,3
1Biobyte solutions GmbH, Bothestr 142, 69126 Heidelberg, German
2EMBL, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.
3Department of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Michael Henderson1, Carol Inatsuka2, Amanda J. Sheets1, Corinne L. Williams3, David J. Benaron2, Gina M. Donato4, Mary C. Gray4, Erik L. Hewlett4, Peggy A. Cotter1,3
1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.
2Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA.
3Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, USA
4Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, USA
Eisha Nisar1, Rong Chen2, Atul Janardhan Butte2
1Faisalabad Medical University, faisalabad, Pakistan.
2Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Olusola Ayanniyi1, Olusoji G. Ige2
1Department of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
2Physiotherapy Department, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan/UCH, Ibadan, Nigeria.